We
would not spend more on education because the inversion received by the system now
a days is already enough. A bigger inversion without control could produce a
extremely chaos and the government will not know at which hands the money that
we pay for our taxes, is.
We
had better find different ways to improve our educational system before star
spending again no having any specific organization on it. “Using the money way
is not really necessary at all”. We have another ways, per example, the state
can make a check about other systems around the world and how they have made
changes on their educational systems and like this look the most convenient for
our one.
“The
way to improve schools is investing more money on education”, it is false, as
least in our case. Even there are a lot of things we may show against this
idea. One of them is the pretty good example that exists in Dominican Republic,
years ago the percentage for the educational sector grew up till 4%, but anyway
generally speaking this area of the national life has not improved enough.
Something
else is that one of the principals or probably the principal cause of
corruption into the government is because money politicians receive to invest
on their cities is not regulated for an organization, so they are able to do whatever
they want with national’s taxes and there the consequences when an educational
system does not have an strict plan first.
Inversion
is not the magic solution to improve education. It does not y like that. More
inversion on education is not the answer that we are looking for. If the
educative politic does not change, we will not have different results. We
cannot have different results using the same way. Ismael Sanz who
is responsible of the famous proves PISA, does not believe that economic growth
is synonymous with optimal teaching.
Fail
formula of education: “money guarantees results”. It is not possible to
get everything only with monetary recourse.
Quality
is one of the most important things we need in an efficient system. For example
in Finland the students who want to become teachers must to be in the
10% of best students, in South Korea in the 5%.
At
the end something we already need to have for a better education is not a major
inversion, is really an independent system where every areas be down control
often developing innovating methodology strategies for teach any subject.
Images: https://unsplash.com/
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario